The rebuilt London Bridge and Thameslink


London Bridge station
New London Bridge station

One of GLUG’s key concerns over the last few years was the rebuilding of London Bridge station and the consequent disruption to train services. Whilst GLUG supported the re-build, there was huge disruption, with frequent bank holiday/weekend closures, a reduction in peak services of 50%, and the loss of direct services to Charing Cross.



Work was completed in January 2018, but the disruption did not end there. Southeastern did not honour its commitment to restore the service to its pre-2015 level. As a result of GLUG’s protests, two peak time services were lengthened to 10 coaches. We were also told that it would improve in May 2018, when Thameslink services were due to begin on the Greenwich line. This would be an all day service and would provide more trains and additional capacity at peak times. It has not turned out like that, and disruption continued.

Thameslink trains on the Greenwich line

The £6.5bn cost of the Thameslink Programme is designed to allow 24 trains per hour (tph) through the central Blackfriars – St. Pancras section. 16 of these trains also run through London Bridge, and 2 of them run along the Greenwich line to Rainham.

Greenwich did not feature in the original plans, but when it was proposed in 2016 that  2tph would run between Luton and Rainham, calling at all stations on the Greenwich line, GLUG welcomed it. The service would:

  • restore the number of peak trains to/from London bridge to the 2015/16 level
  • improve the range of services, with direct trains to St. Pancras, Farringdon (for an Elizabeth Line connection to Heathrow from December 2019), Luton Airport and the Medway towns.
  • Improve the late evening service from London Bridge, with 6tph until 21.00

When the service began in May 2018, it was a shambles with a very high level of

Thameslink at Maze Hill
Thameslink train at Maze Hill

cancellations. On one day, only 5 of the 36 scheduled services actually ran. The weekend service was suspended entirely.

GLUG has protested to the Secretary of State GLUG letter to Chris Grayling  and issued a Press Statement Press Release. 

Whilst the service is a little better, the full timetable is still some way off and the aim of the GTR is to introduce it by December 2018.

In the meantime, an interim timetable has been published GTR Interim timetable 15 July and has operated since 15 July. Of the 36 weekday trains, 15 are cancelled, but the reliability of the remaining 21 trains is much better, with very few cancellations. Weekend services also started running on 4 August, although only hourly between Rainham and Kentish Town. They too have been fairly reliable. So, things are improving, but GLUG is maintaining pressure for the full May timetable to be introduced as soon as possible.

The Office of Road and Rail (ORR) commissioned an Inquiry into the failure of the May timetable. GLUG made a submission to this Inquiry ORR timetable inquiry submission final and the Inquiry report has now been published Inquiry press release  It found that nobody was in charge. GTR failed to plan adequately and conducted no stress tests, whilst the Department for Transport failed to approve the timetable proposals in time for a substantial rewrite. Assurances given by GTR before the timetable was introduced were based on an inadequate understanding of the risks.

The House of Commons Transport Select Committee has also begun an inquiry. GLUG has made a submission to the Select Committee that can be read here: Select Committee GTR timetable submission final. The Thameslink Readiness Board have already given oral evidence, which shows an alarming complacency and lack of co-operation between all parties. Their evidence can be read here: Transport Committee oral evidence


2 thoughts on “The rebuilt London Bridge and Thameslink

  1. Let me get this straight. I use Maze Hill station every Saturday to get to Waterloo East to go to music college. I have to change at London Bridge.

    Are you literally saying there will be no chance for me to change trains (so I cannot get to Waterloo East at all) for another 3 years?

    The 386 is going to have a lot of people travelling to Blackheath for a line at this rate.

    Can someone clarify me if I am wrong about no access to Waterloo between 2015 and 2018.


  2. You are not wrong. Alternatives would include:

    Maze Hill – Greenwich – Lewisham (via DLR) – Waterloo East

    or (until August 2016) Maze Hill – London Bridge – Southwark / Waterloo (via Jubilee line)

    Either of these should be OK on a Saturday, but both would be horrible at peak time.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s